water pollution in the city |water pollution city skylines,water pollution in a city,water pollution in thane city.

water pollution in the city

Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency fires new spherical in pollution fight with SF
The Environmental Protection Agency distributed the flames of AN current dispute with metropolis on Thursday, reaffirming its stance that the city’s water agency improperly discharges waste product into the ocean.
In a letter to the metropolis Public Utilities Commission, EPA officials reiterated their assessment that the city was out of step with its wastewater discharge permit, which regulates water quality standards. The letter conjointly silent that state water regulators could have erred in issue permits to the SFPUC. The centralized offers the state the authority to issue waste product discharge permits underneath the Clean Water Act.
Federal officers wrote that they doubted the SFPUC might “demonstrate compliance” within the close to term with the terms of its permits, and so they “strongly urge you to enter into ... an enforceable agreement with the EPA.”
The Environmental Protection Agency hit metropolis with a violation notice in Gregorian calendar month, accusing the city of improperly discharging waste into the ocean. On prime of alleging that the SFPUC wasn’t meeting federal pollution standards for waste product discharge, the EPA also accused the city of improperly maintaining its sewer system and failing to keep adequate records once folks might need been exposed to pollution. Thursday’s letter was a rebuttal to correspondence the SFPUC sent to the Environmental Protection Agency in Gregorian calendar month difference it had been not in violation of its permits.
City officials, including Mayor London Breed and City Attorney Dennis Herrera, previously denounced the violation notice as a politically motivated ploy by the Trump administration to stick a thumb in the eye of San Francisco and California. President Trump, citing no evidence, hinted at the violation notice in September after remarking that used needles and other pollutants were flowing into the ocean.
Despite the accusations, a few weeks after issuing its violation notice, the EPA gave the SFPUC access to a $236 million loan for water infrastructure improvements.
The Environmental Protection Agency conjointly took issue with the state of CA in Sep. A letter accused California of failing to deal with several cases of water pollution, and federal officials called out the “piles of human feces” in San Francisco.
The SFPUC, which is in the midst of a multibillion dollar upgrade of the city’s century-old sewer system, maintains that San Francisco is in full compliance with the terms of its discharge permits under the Clean Water Act and there is no threat to public health or the environment.
Michael Carlin, deputy general manger of the SFPUC, said he saw some inconsistency at the heart of the EPA’s threats: “Why do we need to be ‘urged’ if we’re such an egregious discharger?” Carlin asked, rhetorically.
A history of non-compliance would likely have already prompted action by the EPA, Carlin said, rather than a plea to enter a voluntary deal. The EPA, he said, was reinterpreting the terms of the wastewater discharge permits in ways that could put the city in jeopardy of noncompliance.
“They’re ‘urging’ us because they’re not sure if they’re on firm ground,” Carlin said, adding that the SFPUC would continue conversations with state regulators as it prepares a response to the EPA’s latest letter. The EPA could still hit the city with an enforcement action, which would escalate the dispute significantly, and could lead to a legal battle should the city decide to contest it.
“EPA’s expectation ... is that San Francisco will take steps to improve their system to comply with water quality standards,” a spokeswoman for the agency said.